In House Payroll vs Outside Vendor (CA users)
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:47 pm
Question in short: We are using v11, and using it to cut checks for employees now (1 FT senior pastor, 2 PT staff) , How easy is it for new bookkeeper to learn to comply with federal (form 941) and state PIT filing requirements? (We don't pay UI, SDI, or ETT) Does the risk of liability of fines for errors justify a move to an outside vendor, like ADP who assumes all liability?
We are a small church of less than a 100 in a rural community where every penny counts. If possible I'd like to be able to discuss this question by phone with California users who use Powerchurch to process payroll requirements in house. Email me and I can return your phone call. I realise that some of this may be subjective, and that there is not necessarily a "pat" answer; however I would like some opinions.
Scenerio: I am having a hard time justifying a consideration by the board for the expenditure to pay an outside vendor to run payroll when we are already cutting all checks in Powerchurch v11 and the program prints form 941 and the W2's (as I understand it). I need to be able to explain and understand the pros and cons. (Note: The new bookkeeper has little bookkeeping knowledge and is a quick learner currently being trained by a CPA) The first part of the fiscal year we were using Quickbooks for bookkeeping, and Powerchurch for contributions. I have been here four years and the church has run payroll in house while a CPA filed the quarterly's and did W2's I made a recommendation that we consolidate all bookkeeping to Powerchurch and stop paying the previous outside CPA to hit the "print" button so to speak since we entered all the payroll and bookkeeping info and then sent her all information via flash drive. We have since converted all to v11 and have payroll setup to cut checks. I'd like the new bookkeeper to go the next step and file the 941, W2's, and DE9 with the state. Since my pay is straight forward being salaried and I pay SE tax, there is really only entries (hrs worked)for two employees. Does the responsibility and possibility of fines justify an outside vendor? It seems that with only 2 PT employees the risk is so minimal. Any thoughts???
We are a small church of less than a 100 in a rural community where every penny counts. If possible I'd like to be able to discuss this question by phone with California users who use Powerchurch to process payroll requirements in house. Email me and I can return your phone call. I realise that some of this may be subjective, and that there is not necessarily a "pat" answer; however I would like some opinions.
Scenerio: I am having a hard time justifying a consideration by the board for the expenditure to pay an outside vendor to run payroll when we are already cutting all checks in Powerchurch v11 and the program prints form 941 and the W2's (as I understand it). I need to be able to explain and understand the pros and cons. (Note: The new bookkeeper has little bookkeeping knowledge and is a quick learner currently being trained by a CPA) The first part of the fiscal year we were using Quickbooks for bookkeeping, and Powerchurch for contributions. I have been here four years and the church has run payroll in house while a CPA filed the quarterly's and did W2's I made a recommendation that we consolidate all bookkeeping to Powerchurch and stop paying the previous outside CPA to hit the "print" button so to speak since we entered all the payroll and bookkeeping info and then sent her all information via flash drive. We have since converted all to v11 and have payroll setup to cut checks. I'd like the new bookkeeper to go the next step and file the 941, W2's, and DE9 with the state. Since my pay is straight forward being salaried and I pay SE tax, there is really only entries (hrs worked)for two employees. Does the responsibility and possibility of fines justify an outside vendor? It seems that with only 2 PT employees the risk is so minimal. Any thoughts???