Church Plant - Chart of Accounts
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:01 am
Hello PC Community. I'm the bookeeper for our new church (Faith Word Community Church). I narrowed down our accounting software to PC+ and another software and finally decided that I liked PC+ better after using the trial version.
I installed 11.5 today and have been going through configuring everything. But... after going through the Accounting Setup.. I'm a little disappointed and was hoping to find a positive answer here. I was hoping for a full blown already provided chart of accounts. But since we have no assets, liabilities, incomes, expenses, etc. (yet)... the setup gave me a very limited chart of accounts. So now... as I start to figure out our first month's expenses (for instance)... I discover 'holes' in my accounts. For example, we rent a gym for Sunday service. But... my COA doesn't have a rent expense which means I have to add it. Which would be fine but... what would be a good place to add it in the various 'holes' I have? Etc.
It would be nice if a full blown "most used" set of accounts was provided. I realize it might be overload... but I'd rather have more than less.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Steve
I installed 11.5 today and have been going through configuring everything. But... after going through the Accounting Setup.. I'm a little disappointed and was hoping to find a positive answer here. I was hoping for a full blown already provided chart of accounts. But since we have no assets, liabilities, incomes, expenses, etc. (yet)... the setup gave me a very limited chart of accounts. So now... as I start to figure out our first month's expenses (for instance)... I discover 'holes' in my accounts. For example, we rent a gym for Sunday service. But... my COA doesn't have a rent expense which means I have to add it. Which would be fine but... what would be a good place to add it in the various 'holes' I have? Etc.
It would be nice if a full blown "most used" set of accounts was provided. I realize it might be overload... but I'd rather have more than less.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Steve