Help with payroll

Fund Accounting, Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Payroll

Moderators: Moderators, Tech Support

Post Reply
cwalkerm20
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:58 am

Help with payroll

Post by cwalkerm20 »

Yesterday the 28th was payroll everything went fine, until I realized I posted payroll to march. or at least i think i did. I printed the checks and then went up to fund accounting and clicked post transactions, that is when i realized it was for march. I didn't post them. okay so then i went back to payroll and voided all those checks and put them in manually with the new working month being April. So then i went back up to fund accounting=post transactions and there is transactions to post in march and april. I have had VERY little training with this software, and I feel i have done something wrong. My question is... should i go ahead and post the transactions for both months, and if i do will the checks i wrote show up twice? Or can I erase the unposted transactions for march. Please help

Zorak
Tech Support
Tech Support
Posts: 3112
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:59 am
Location: PowerChurch Software
Contact:

Post by Zorak »

At this point, you can verify what transactions are out there waiting to post by running an "Unposted Transactions" report from the Accounting > Fund Accounting > Reports - Fund Accounting menu.

You should see the original checks for March, then the voided checks for March, then the corrected checks for April.

In going back to the start of the problem, when you realized the checks were about to post to March, you could have simply gone to Accounting>Fund Accounting>Modify Unposted Transactions and changed the month from March to April. This would have saved the steps of voiding PR checks and reentering them.

RLM
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: NsFCC
Contact:

Post by RLM »

I had a similar issue with a recent week's payroll which involved three checks. When I made the correction prior to posting (I am at work & don't have it in front of me) 'saved' it I get an error that states something to effect of the change not affecting AP. Should I proceed with the 'save'? Or, is there a better method of dealing with this?
In Him,

RLM

Zorak
Tech Support
Tech Support
Posts: 3112
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:59 am
Location: PowerChurch Software
Contact:

Post by Zorak »

If the problem is simply the accounting month, then yes, it is OK to fix it directly in Fund Accounting. Other things, such as check number, date, amounts, etc. would most likely be better fixed by voiding the check in Accounts Payable and reentering as a manual check. Changes made in Accounts Payable will of course update the Fund Accounting numbers as well.

Post Reply