Correcting transactions in Accounts Payable
Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 9:24 pm
We recently “discovered” the Release Restricted Funds buttons on the AP module Maintain Open Invoices and the Funds Accounting (FA) module Enter Transaction screens. A few transactions later, we also discovered these Release buttons will double the debit to a 48xx release account if this account has already been assigned the original debit for the transaction. One debit goes to the checking account and the other goes to the 49xx account, so the transaction appears correctly balanced. Both debits close to the associated 32xx equity account, so that account is reduced twice as much as it should be with each transaction.
We solved the double debit problem by creating a series of matching expense accounts, using the same last two main account numbers and the same 3-digit subaccount numbers. The initial (real?) transaction debits to the expense account and the release account debit goes on to the 32xx and 49xx accounts. (These expense accounts are unbudgeted since they won’t handle unrestricted operating funds and can thus be excluded from some reports.)
During the interval between the above discoveries, a few checks were written to cover some specific vendor invoices and some credit card payments, and the associated transactions contained double debits that must now be removed. All these transactions have been posted in the FA module and need to be reversed and re-entered.
Reversal and re-entry are straightforward in the FA module. However, for checks that were processed through the AP module, the caveat on manual pages 206-7 cautions:
Note: If the entry you need to correct was created in one of the other modules (e.g. Accounts Payable), your void and correcting entries should be created in the originating module instead.
We are looking for the appropriate method to access a posted transaction through the AP module for correction.
In the AP module, the Locate functions on both the Maintain Open Invoices and Maintain Computer Generated Checks only list recent, apparently unposted, transactions. The Void Check function does not offer a screen for transaction re-entry. We are uncertain as to whether the number of a voided check could be re-used if a corrected transaction were entered for it. (We don’t want to remove the check number, only correct the transaction involving it.)
If a transaction can only be corrected in the FA module, will the corrected data be transmitted to those locations that will ensure all report data is accurate?
Is the caveat in the manual incorrect (or inapplicable)?
We solved the double debit problem by creating a series of matching expense accounts, using the same last two main account numbers and the same 3-digit subaccount numbers. The initial (real?) transaction debits to the expense account and the release account debit goes on to the 32xx and 49xx accounts. (These expense accounts are unbudgeted since they won’t handle unrestricted operating funds and can thus be excluded from some reports.)
During the interval between the above discoveries, a few checks were written to cover some specific vendor invoices and some credit card payments, and the associated transactions contained double debits that must now be removed. All these transactions have been posted in the FA module and need to be reversed and re-entered.
Reversal and re-entry are straightforward in the FA module. However, for checks that were processed through the AP module, the caveat on manual pages 206-7 cautions:
Note: If the entry you need to correct was created in one of the other modules (e.g. Accounts Payable), your void and correcting entries should be created in the originating module instead.
We are looking for the appropriate method to access a posted transaction through the AP module for correction.
In the AP module, the Locate functions on both the Maintain Open Invoices and Maintain Computer Generated Checks only list recent, apparently unposted, transactions. The Void Check function does not offer a screen for transaction re-entry. We are uncertain as to whether the number of a voided check could be re-used if a corrected transaction were entered for it. (We don’t want to remove the check number, only correct the transaction involving it.)
If a transaction can only be corrected in the FA module, will the corrected data be transmitted to those locations that will ensure all report data is accurate?
Is the caveat in the manual incorrect (or inapplicable)?